Your Review:

How many substantial concepts does this tutorial address?

2-3 substantial concepts covered in the tutorial

Does the title and the outline of the tutorial properly reflect the content?

The title is somewhat misleading and/or the outline is not detailed or informative enough.

Did the contributor provide supplementary resources, such as code and sample files in the contribution post or a linked GitHub repository?

Contributor provides minimal supplementary resources.

Is the tutorial part of a series?

Yes, but it is irrelevant with the series.

Does the tutorial contain sufficient explanatory visuals?

The post lacked sufficient visualization to easily learn from the content.

How unique and/or innovative are the concepts covered in the tutorial?

Similar or superior tutorials can be found online with great ease

How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?


How would you rate the overall value of this contribution on the open source community and ecosystem?

This contribution adds nearly no value to the open source community and ecosystem or the specific project.