Your Review:

Did the designer include a selection of distinctive designs or variations for the project owner to choose from?

Only one distinctive design was provided among the provided designs.

Does the contribution include files for immediate use in all requested formats?

Yes, all requested file formats were provided with a clear files structure.

Technical quality of graphics was:

Excellent, no mistakes within the design.

How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?

Good. The post contains some minor mistakes in formatting or language usage that worsen the readability of the post.

What is the visibility impact on OS community and the popularity of the project?

The project is know in the community and had many contributors and users. The number of the repository's stars and forks is greater than 500 or the project has been actively developed for at least one year.

How would you describe the presentation of the graphics contribution in the post?

Good. The presentation is visually appealing but does not offer details to learn about the choices made during the creation process and/or contains some minor issues.

Uniqueness and creativity of the graphics contribution?

It is generic and lacks originality as shown with examples.

Technical difficulty of the graphics?

Is the provided design actively used by the project? (e.g. on official website, app store, in an app, software)