Your Review:

Did the designer include a selection of distinctive designs or variations for the project owner to choose from?

Between 2 and 3; the designs were complex and took a fair amount of work.

Does the contribution include files for immediate use in all requested formats?

No, submitted files were not ready for immediate use and require editing or adjustments.

Technical quality of graphics was:

Good but the design has some serious flaws that need to be corrected.

How would you describe the formatting, language and overall presentation of the post?

Good. The post contains some minor mistakes in formatting or language usage that worsen the readability of the post.

What is the visibility impact on OS community and the popularity of the project?

The project is known among people but is not so popular. The number of the repository's stars and forks is greater than 100 or the project has been actively developed for at least 6 months.

How would you describe the presentation of the graphics contribution in the post?

Average. The presentation includes the graphics but lacks author's originality and does not offer details about the graphics and/or it contains issues that should be corrected.

Uniqueness and creativity of the graphics contribution?

It is unique, well-thought and suits the project well.

Technical difficulty of the graphics?

Medium. The contribution consists of some complex elements, shapes and/or effects made by the contributor.

Is the provided design actively used by the project? (e.g. on official website, app store, in an app, software)

It was not used, but the proposed designs are of a high quality.