Between 2 and 3; the designs were complex and took a fair amount of work.
No, submitted files were not ready for immediate use and require editing or adjustments.
Good but the design has some serious flaws that need to be corrected.
Good. The post contains some minor mistakes in formatting or language usage that worsen the readability of the post.
The project is known among people but is not so popular. The number of the repository's stars and forks is greater than 100 or the project has been actively developed for at least 6 months.
Average. The presentation includes the graphics but lacks author's originality and does not offer details about the graphics and/or it contains issues that should be corrected.
It is unique, well-thought and suits the project well.
Medium. The contribution consists of some complex elements, shapes and/or effects made by the contributor.
It was not used, but the proposed designs are of a high quality.